Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Tasty
"Some consider carob an adequate substitute for chocolate . . . because it can be made to approximate the color and consistency of chocolate. The same arguments can be made in favor of dirt." Sandra Boynton
Amen.

11 comments:

  1. Amen Sister!!! It can't even be counted as a food group. Chocolate can, It's a vegetable. Bean. What is carob? I'll have to google it.
    Bonnie

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'll add my Amen too! LOL

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sandra Boynton is VERY smart! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh man my Mom was forced to eat that as a child... needless to say we are all M&M and Cadbury addicts!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Who are those deluded people???

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:27 AM

    *snorts* Carob? What kind of name is that anyway? It sounds like somebody had a cold and was trying to say, "carrot." And they got confused... because colds can mess with minds you know. And while they were in this deluded state, they were ACTUALLY trying to say, "chocolate!"

    ReplyDelete
  7. THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR CHOCOLATE ; )

    ReplyDelete
  8. With you on this one.... ALL THE FRAKIN' WAY, BABY!

    Give me chocolate, or give me death!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just because it looks like chocolate doesn't mean it tastes like chocolate. So Amen indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Why anyone would want to substitute something else for chocolate is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete

Comment if you dare...